🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are watching intently to see if this approach will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a growing number of states are moving toward similar restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and networks are "robbing our children's childhood". A law may be formalized next year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to enact a bill increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a related move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended families to block their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a advisory resolution calling for a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is granted. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age limit is a good first step," stated the MEP supporting the resolution.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the leadership has not ruled out a future ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any action must be "grounded in strong research".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end watered down. However, the administration pledged to investigate the issue.

Charities have expressed apprehensions. An organization established by the relatives of a teenager who was lost after being exposed to dangerous social media material contends that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to design products and services that are safe and suitable for young users," said a leading child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, regulation is primarily happening at the local government level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a regulation capping teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further access needing parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted bills demanding guardian approval for under-16s to create social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from certain politicians to copy the Australian example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, further nations are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, international bodies take a more nuanced position. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

While this worldwide debate continues, the actions of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that governments around the world are no longer content to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.